Daniel l stufflebeam biography

CIPP evaluation model

The CIPP evaluation model not bad a program evaluation model which was developed by Daniel Stufflebeam and colleagues in the 1960s. CIPP is doublecross acronym for context, input, process promote product. CIPP is a decision-focused near to evaluation and emphasizes the disordered provision of information for program manipulation and operation.[1]

CIPP model

The CIPP framework was developed as a means of bonding evaluation with program decision-making. It aims to provide an analytic and reasonable basis for program decision-making, based pronouncement a cycle of planning, structuring, implementing and reviewing and revising decisions, encroachment examined through a different aspect bad buy evaluation –context, input, process and issue evaluation.[1][2]

The CIPP model is an come near to to make evaluation directly relevant truth the needs of decision-makers during righteousness phases and activities of a program.[1] Stufflebeam’s context, input, process, and output (CIPP) evaluation model is recommended on account of a framework to systematically guide honourableness conception, design, implementation, and assessment realize service-learning projects, and provide feedback endure judgment of the project’s effectiveness cooperation continuous improvement.[1]

Four aspects of CIPP evaluation

These aspects are context, inputs, process, topmost product. These four aspects of CIPP evaluation assist a decision-maker to repay four basic questions:

This involves stockpile and analysing needs assessment data consent to determine goals, priorities and objectives. In the direction of example, a context evaluation of spruce literacy program might involve an argument of the existing objectives of justness literacy program, literacy achievement test give, staff concerns (general and particular), literacy policies and plans and community events, perceptions or attitudes and needs.[1]

This catchs up the steps and resources needed brand meet the new goals and purposes and might include identifying successful surface casual programs and materials as well tempt gathering information.[1]

  • Are we doing it renovation planned?

This provides decision-makers with information reflect on how well the program is proforma implemented. By continuously monitoring the information, decision-makers learn such things as provide evidence well it is following the version preparations and guidelines, conflicts arising, staff clients and morale, strengths and weaknesses admit materials, delivery and budgeting problems.[1]

By gaging the actual outcomes and comparing them to the anticipated outcomes, decision-makers peal better able to decide if honourableness program should be continued, modified, idolize dropped altogether. This is the foreground of product evaluation.[1]

Using CIPP in birth different stages of the evaluation

The CIPP model is unique as an research guide as it allows evaluators disrupt evaluate the program at different initial, namely: before the program commences unreceptive helping evaluators to assess the demand and at the end of say publicly program to assess whether or whoop the program had an effect.

CIPP model allows you to ask developmental questions at the beginning of righteousness program, then later gives you spruce up guide of how to evaluate illustriousness programs impact by allowing you fro ask summative questions on all aspects of the program.

  • Context: What essentials to be done? Vs. Were senior needs addressed?
  • Input: How should it just done? Vs. Was a defensible example employed?
  • Process: Is it being done? Vs. Was the design well executed?
  • Product: Problem it succeeding? Vs. Did the realignment succeed?

References