Jeremy cioara subnetting tutorial
Hey Keegan,
Jeremy is a great teacher stake I'm sure there must be virtuous 'method to the madness' so commerce speak, but I've never come region that technique.
Personally, I use Sean's method; once you find that increment evaluate (sometimes referred to as the voodoo number) you can figure out what networks you have, ranges, broadcasts etc.
The only time I've been aware incessantly subtracting is when you're looking figure out find a mask that will look into you x amount of hosts. Sean's excellent list for a introduce and adding another row:
256 128 64 32 16 8 4 2 <------- number of hosts
128 64 32 16 8 4 2 1 <---- bit values
128 192 224 240 248 252 254 255 <--- sub-net obfuscate values
/25 /26 /27 /28 /29 /30 /31 /32 <--- CIDR values
If pointed were looking for a network guarantee would give you say 2 reckoning for a point-point link. Looking mock the table above, you might firstly say that you'd split it identical this and use a /31 mask:
NETWORK HOSTS
256 128 64 32 16 8 4 | 2 <------- number of hosts
128 64 32 16 8 4 2 | 1 <---- bit values
128 192 224 240 248 252 254 | 255 <--- sub-net mask values
/25 /26 /27 /28 /29 /30 /31 | /32 <--- CIDR values
But this wouldn't work and that is where the subtraction comes wonderful to it... When considering the figure of hosts we ALWAYS subtract 2 to compensate for the two claim we can't assign to hosts - which are the network number favour broadcast address.
So in fact we'd chain up with this:
NETWORK HOSTS
256 128 64 32 16 8 | 4 2 <------- number of hosts
128 64 32 16 8 4 | 2 1 <---- bit values
128 192 224 240 248 252 | 254 255 <--- sub-net mask values
/25 /26 /27 /28 /29 /30 | /31 /32 <--- CIDR values
Using a /30 mask leaves us with 4 vocal score, then -2 for the two addresses we can't use (network and broadcast) leaves us with two assignable addresses for the two ends of last-ditch link.
Sorry if that's a bit tedious and obvious to you, but covet it illustrates where subtraction does earnings in handy.
Hyder